The Death of Center-Leftism and the Decline of the Democratic Party

Editorial by: Jett

In the midst of all the hoopla and hype over the debt ceiling and the federal budget, my mom asked me what did I think was driving Obama?  My mom initially supported him.  She even bought a porcelain plaque with his picture on it and put it up in the kitchen where I had to look at it every time I went to visit.  Even though she didn’t go out to vote in 2008, her support was emotionally apparent.  All of that changed, however, the longer she listened to him and became more engaged with the issues.  Now she can’t stand him.  She’s actually become a fan of Michelle Bachman and has even warmed up to Sarah Palin (though she still doesn’t think she’s experienced enough to be president).  The fact that her view of Obama has evolved the more objectively–and factually–she looked at the issues provides a measure of hope for those of us who are trying to figure out how to break the anointed ones spell over the populace before the 2012 election.

I have the same issue with some of my liberal friends–especially the black ones.  Their support of all things Democratic is reflexive.  A vote for a conservative Republican is tantamount to racial treason.  They view the world through the emotional prism of race and historical racial prejudice that all African-Americans (a term I hate because Africa is a very diverse continent, not a country) are indoctrinated into from birth.  They then succumb to the same liberal emotional conditioning that all Americans are subject to from the two main institutions that carry out that process: the K-12 public school system and the media (both entertainment and news).  Since I woke up in 2000 and started voting Republican (my evolution to that position over a fifteen year period will be enunciated and explicated in a book I’m working on) all of my left wing friends have turned their back on me.  I’m persona non grata.  Even my former best friend has cut the communication cord between us.

A few years ago I asked him where he was at politically.  He told me that although there were some conservative things he believed in (he didn’t get specific) he was still basically center-left.  Of course, with American blacks their aversion to the more nuanced worldview of Republicanism (there are at least four, if not more, different kinds) is somewhat, if not exclusively, based on a whole host of historical fallacies and inaccuracies, not to mention the one key fact that most are either loathe to admit or completely ignorant of–that the Republican Party was founded as an anti-slavery (at least in the new territories) party.  No, they weren’t abolitionists (initially), but they clearly didn’t want to see this evil system spread any further (beyond the Mississippi river) than it already had.  The Democrats at the time were the party and the power of the South and of slavery.  Indeed, it was their insistence on increasing their political dominance by proxy that led to the passage of the three fifths clause in the constitution.  But that Democratic Party evolved and finally bought off the black community with a grab bag of affirmative action, quotas, minority set-asides, misinformation, public housing (ghetto-ization), welfare state dependency, and pop culture trinkets (and its attendant faux status).

What I never said to my former best friend at the time of that conversation is what I’m going to say now: there is no such thing as center-left.  The center-left perspective (as it were) died with the disintegration of the Lyndon Johnson administration.  The anti-war riots at the Democratic National Convention in 1968 sparked the rise of the New Left which effectively put an end to Cold War liberalism and replaced it with a creeping Euro-style democratic socialism that has now completely taken over the once more pragmatic and common sense (under John F. Kennedy) Democratic Party.  From the evolution of the McGovern wing of the party, to the rise and subsequent decline of the Carter Doctrine, to the ’80s rainbow campaigns of Jesse Jackson, to the triangulation of baby boomer Bill (Clinton, who graduated from Georgetown in ’68), and, finally, to the “hope and change” theme of Barrack Hussein Obama, the Democrats have clearly moved towards the only position open to them: further to the left and closer to a Gramscian (or Fabian, if you will) style socialism.  Essentially, what we have in America right now are three political ideologies: the far left of the MoveOn.org (think George Soros) driven Democrats with their Hollywood activist mouthpieces, the status quo mushy middle of faux liberals and RINOs, and, lastly, the principled populist conservatism of the Tea Party (and Republican Study Committee).

This historical process then begs the question: what happened to center-left Kennedyesque liberalism?  For the most part, it succeeded.  The Voting Rights & Civil Rights Acts passed.  Jim Crow died.  Roe v. Wade triumphed.  Virtually every law that could be passed to defend the “rights” of protected classes of people has been passed.  There is nowhere else for liberalism and the Democratic Party to go but further towards implementing full blown Marxist-informed socialism.  Hence, the embrace of illegal immigrant rights and amnesty, gay marriage, marijuana legalization, socialized universal healthcare insurance, and the piece de resistance: an ever-expanding government (state and federal) that is now attempting to co-opt the middle class by providing dependency-inducing entitlements and will ultimately become 50% plus of the GDP (it’s currently ballooned to 36% after a historical high of 27% during the Great Society years). The GOP, on the other hand, wants a balanced budget amendment within which federal spending will be limited to 18% of GDP.  And that’s what’s driving the Obama agenda–a dogged determination culled from his own reading of radical progressivism (again, socialism) to increase spending and expand the power of the party of government (the Democrats) in order to create a permanent governing majority for the left.  And, in the process of expanding government, if your rights or property or freedoms are trampled on you will have no recourse because the internal logic of this new system will be the supremacy of the collective state over the individual.

This is why there is no more center-left in America today.  The evolution of the political spectrum has made it irrelevant.  You can’t embrace a philosophy that no longer has a base or a reason for being (which is why the mushy middle mentioned above is scorned and rejected by both sides of the spectrum).  The bottom line is that the Obamanistas know full well that a balanced budget amendment, spending cuts, and a cap on federal spending as a specific percentage of GDP (all contained in the House passed “Cut, Cap & Balance” bill) will permanently derail the continued implementation of the ever-expanding government philosophy and, possibly, give the Republicans a majority for decades to come. So when you hear Nancy Pelosi say that the Democrats are fighting to “save the world from the Republican budget,” and “to save life on this planet as we know it today,” you know the world she’s talking about is the inside-the-beltway world of Democratic politicians and the lives she’s speaking of are the political lives of those same Democrats; for without big government, they’ll all dry up and wither away–ironically, just like Karl Marx said the capitalist state ultimately would.

Share

One Response to “The Death of Center-Leftism and the Decline of the Democratic Party”

  1. lawrence carver on February 14th, 2013 at 5:31 am

    I see where you’re going with all of these statements. I believe some of what you are saying such as the bill’s that you stated and statistical GDP figures. The only problem is this isn’t an objective representation of the circumstances that truly govern these statistics. The rise in government was brought built up during the Regan years, new administrations such as “Homeland Security” under the Bush years, Obama bailing out failing corporations which is a huge uptick in the spending relative to GDP. The point is that who ever is president doesn’t stick to the ideals of their parties. Whether they are Republican or Democrat, it makes no difference. The only difference is which one made you hurt at your most impressionable age. For me, that was Bush because I grew up in that era, others will have impressions based on who was in power and whether they felt oppressed or uplifted by the current parties in power. Your information makes sense, but in the end man who cares? You can’t do anything about it, and anyone you support will not stand for you when the time comes, they will stand for themselves. Why not just enjoy life? Call up your best friend and invite them out for a beer and forget about politics, don’t let it define your life.

Leave a Reply